KiwiRail: Doomed to Fail?

Luke Malpass
10 September 2009 | IA115
KiwiRail: Doomed to Fail?

ia115Government ownership cannot and will not ‘fix’ rail in New Zealand.  Luke Malpass argues that one year after the renationalisation, it has become clear that the previous government’s justifications for purchasing this expensive, loss-making asset were driven more by ideology rather than sound economic or social reasons.

Since the New Zealand rail system was nationalised in 2008, it has already cost the taxpayer around $1 billion. In the year since the purchase, KiwiRail has lost almost $1 million of value per day, and keeping trains running will require ongoing taxpayer subsidies regardless of ownership,’ says Malpass. ‘There are too many kilometres of track and insufficient demand from New Zealand’s small population to reach a commercially viable break even point.’

‘The renationalisation of KiwiRail was a flawed decision.’

‘Treasury repeatedly advised the Clark government that a change of ownership would not change the underlying problems with rail. Yet KiwiRail was purchased for environmental reasons like getting more traffic off roads, reducing carbon emissions, and promoting sustainability.’

The reform, rationalisation and resale of KiwiRail should be a top priority for the government.

‘KiwiRail needs to be restructured and privatised in separate pieces. The commercially viable parts can be privatised and certain lines sold to interested parties like ports and private companies.’

‘Isolating the profitable parts of the rail system from the failures would help stem the flow of losses and give re-privatised parts of the system the best chance of success,’ says Malpass.

Treasury estimates that to break even, the serviced track distance will have to shrink from 4,000kms to approximately 2,300kms. To achieve this, extensive track closure is required. The unprofitable parts of the line should be shut down and the land sold, or put to better uses, such as part of the new national cycleway.

‘KiwiRail should not continue in its current form; it will become a soak hole for cash. The best thing government can do is get it off its books,’ says Malpass.

Latest Publications

Eight Housing Affordability Myths
Stephen Kirchner
10 July 2014 | IA146

Australians are conflicted in their attitude to this long-run change in real house prices because they are both investors in housing as an asset class and consumers of housing services. This conflicted attitude on the part of the public is reflected in confused public policies followed by Australian governments. Unfortunately, many of the policies pursued by Australian governments in the…

Still Damaging and Disturbing: Australian Child Protection Data and the Need for National Adoption Targets
Jeremy Sammut
16 April 2014 | IA145

In December 2013, the Abbott government announced plans to make it easier for Australian parents to adopt children both locally and from overseas. Acknowledging the official ‘taboo’ on adoption in Australia, Prime Minister Tony Abbott ordered an inter-departmental committee to recommend ways to take adoption out of the ‘too-hard’ basket. The chief barrier to raising the number of local adoptions…

Why Jaydon Can’t Read: A Forum on Fixing Literacy
Jennifer Buckingham, Justine Ferrari, Tom Alegounarias
18 February 2014 | IA144

Many thousands of Australian students have very low levels of literacy after spending four or more years at school. The Spring 2014 issue of the CIS journal Policy contained an article called ‘Why Jaydon Can’t Read: How Ideology Triumphed Over Evidence in Teaching Reading’, which concluded that students were not being provided with the most effective evidence-based reading instruction in…

Independent Charities, Independent Regulators: The Future of Not-for-Profit Regulation
Helen Andrews
06 February 2014 | IA143

The Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission was established by the Gillard government in 2012 with the intended purpose of cutting the red tape faced by Australia’s charities. So far, the regulator has failed to make any significant progress on this goal or on its two other main goals: increasing public trust in charities and improving the quality of regulatory oversight…

The New Silence: Family Breakdown and Child Sexual Abuse
Jeremy Sammut
30 January 2014 | IA142

Despite family breakdown exposing children to greater risk of sexual abuse, the issue receives scant attention in this country. Child sexual abuse is not fully and frankly discussed because the public discourse is self-censored by politicians, academics, social service organisations, and the media in compliance with politically correct attitudes towards ‘family diversity’—the socially ‘progressive’ and ‘non-judgmental’ fiction that says the…