Products – The Centre for Independent Studies

Overcoming Governance and Cost Challenges for Australian Public Hospitals: The Foundation Trust Alternative

Jeremy Sammut, Peter Phelan
13 October 2013 | PM137
Overcoming Governance and Cost Challenges for Australian Public Hospitals: The Foundation Trust Alternative

Australia will face problems funding its public hospital and other publicly funded health services if cost increases continue at the current rate in the context of ever-increasing use and an ageing population. The challenges of sustainably financing the cost of health will be exacerbated by inefficiencies in the public hospital sector—unless productivity improvements reduce the quantity of public resources consumed by public hospitals.

This report identifies and discusses some of the major governance issues that impede public hospital performance and that can be revised within the existing Medicare framework via state government-initiated reforms, principally by adopting quasi market-based initiatives.

Alternative governance arrangements for public hospitals can address existing management problems and also mimic the key factors that international studies show account for better management and superior hospital performance.

The Foundation Trust hospital management and service provision model was introduced into the National Health Service (NHS) in England by the Blair Labor government.

Foundation Trusts combine true managerial independence with genuine financial accountability. Trust hospital boards of directors and CEOs are responsible for managing the hospital’s budget, setting the employment terms and conditions of staff, and overseeing all other operational matters.

Adapting the Trust model to the Australian health system can improve the performance of public hospitals—especially if ‘corporatisation’ is complemented by a broader microeconomic reform agenda encompassing competitive pricing and selective privatisations. This would help control the escalating health expenditure and substantially contribute to the long-term sustainability of the health system as demand rises and population ages.

Peter Phelan is Professor Emeritus of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne. He was Head of the University’s Department of Paediatrics from 1983 to 1997 and a member of the Board of the Royal Children’s Hospital. From 2004 until 2010, he was a member of the Board of Cabrini Health, a large Melbourne not for profit private health care group, serving as Chairman for the latter 4 years. He has also held a number of consultancies for government and the public and private health care sectors, and was Planning Dean for the Bond Medical School.

Dr Jeremy Sammut is a Research Fellow at The Centre for Independent Studies. He has a PhD in Australian Political and Social History from Monash University. Jeremy’s research reports on health policy include The Coming Crisis of Medicare: What the Intergenerational Reports Should Say, But Don’t, About Health and Ageing (2007), Why Public Hospitals are Overcrowded: Ten Points for Policy Makers (2009), and How! Not How Much!: Medicare Spending and Health Resource Allocation in Australia (2011).


Buy Hardcopy
Latest Publications

The Kinship Conundrum: The Impact of Aboriginal Self-Determination on Indigenous Child Protection
Jeremy Sammut
08 December 2014 | PM144

This report argues that mainstreaming revolution in Indigenous policy should be extended to Indigenous child protection policy, and that Aboriginal exceptionalism—typified by the operation of Aboriginal Child Placement Principle (ACPP)—must cease. To help ‘Close the Gap’ in social outcomes between Indigenous and other Australians, Indigenous and non-Indigenous children should be treated the same, including by using adoption (or permanent guardianship)…

An Ounce of Prevention? A Toolkit for Evaluating Preventive Health Measures
Helen Andrews
26 November 2014 | PM143

Preventive health is a broad umbrella that includes such disparate services as vaccines for schoolchildren, blood pressure screenings, ad campaigns to discourage binge drinking, and special taxes on tobacco products. What all these programs have in common is an intention to spend money now in order to save money later—catching costly health problems before they arise or when they are…

Regulating for Quality in Childcare: The Evidence Base
Trisha Jha
05 November 2014 | PM142

The National Quality Agenda (NQA) endorsed by all states and territories in 2009 regulates childcare systems across Australia. It mandates increased minimum standards in various aspects provision of care and a ratings system with the goal of improving quality. The NQA mandates substantial and costly reforms to staff-to-child ratios and carer qualifications of care. This report details that the costs…

Complex Family Payments: What it Costs the Village to Raise a Child
Trisha Jha
06 August 2014 | PM141

In 2013–14, $32 billion was spent on family payments, amounting to 7.7% of total federal expenditure in that year, and 22% of total federal spending on social security and welfare. Family Tax Benefits (FTB) and child care fee assistance are the two areas in which spending is the most significant and, in the case of child care assistance, the most…

Lessons from Singapore: Opt-Out Health Savings Accounts for Australia
David Gadiel, Jeremy Sammut
28 July 2014 | PM140

Singapore’s distinctive health funding and service provision arrangements have delivered comparable First World standards of care and health outcomes at much lower cost. A new vision for funding health in Australia based on the Singapore model could be achieved by applying the principle of choice for those who wish for an alternative to Australia’s taxpayer-funded, universal health care system. This…