Some people don’t want the school system to be accountable to parents. But they forget that government schools exist for parents and their children, not the other way around.
That memory slip is why the National Assessment Program — Literacy and Numeracy is blamed for any stress experienced by students, and for practically everything that is wrong with Australian education.
NAPLAN 2019 began yesterday with more than a million students due to sit the tests between now and May 24. But there is no reason why any student or parent should be anxious.
Critics often decry NAPLAN as a “high-stakes test” but this isn’t accurate. The truth is there are no rewards for high scores or punishments for low scores, and school funding and teacher salaries are never determined by NAPLAN results.
To put it bluntly: if students are seriously stressed about the tests, it is because of the behaviour of adults around them, not because of the structure of NAPLAN.
There is very little rigorous research on the effect of NAPLAN on students but the existing evidence indicates most students don’t experience high levels of anxiety related to the tests.
Yes, almost all students (at any age) temporarily experience low levels of nervousness when doing an assessment. That is natural, but it isn’t even remotely comparable to serious mental health issues.
We aren’t doing students any favours in the long term by trying to coddle them at school and to remove all possible sources of even the slightest stress.
Despite the annual hype, no one is claiming NAPLAN results are the be-all and end-all of school success. It is simply an assessment of student progress in the key areas of literacy and numeracy.
There are, of course, many important elements of education that can’t be quantified, but essential skills such as literacy and numeracy are demonstrably measurable.
NAPLAN data is vital for improving the school system. The results are used to track learning outcomes at the national, state and territory, school system, school, and individual student levels.
For example, my recent research identified the common practices across Australia’s top-performing disadvantaged schools — something not possible without a standardised national assessment.
And for parents — those who are primarily responsible for the education of children, yet so often sidelined in education debates — NAPLAN results can be very useful. Student reports give parents more information about their child’s progress, with an objective national benchmark against which progress can be measured.
A recent Colmar Brunton poll found the clear majority of parents supports NAPLAN and thinks the My School website is important.
But, contrary to some common claims, there is no evidence that NAPLAN results displayed on the My School website are the only factor parents take into account when choosing a school.
The tests are also a way of holding the federal and state governments to account for the productivity of the education system.
Regardless of who wins the election on Saturday, all school sectors will be receiving significant increases in government funding, well above inflation and enrolment growth.
Given the failure of previous spending increases to boost school results — not to mention the international data showing Australia already spends more per school student than the OECD average and several top-performing countries — the very least taxpayers can expect is having a standardised measure such as NAPLAN to evaluate the return on additional investments.
NAPLAN isn’t perfect, but the focus should be on making it better rather than simply scrapping it.
An improvement is the transitioning of the tests to an online format. This allows for tailoring of questions depending on student performance, which provides more precise information. This allows for adaptive testing in which the questions are tailored to each student depending on their performance as the tests progress — so students are given questions from a pool of questions appropriate for them, given their previous answers. And online tests reduce the turnaround time for the assessments which means the data is available for schools earlier in the year to help their students.
Politicians should stand up to the scaremongering and continue working to improve NAPLAN. Parents and taxpayers should demand NAPLAN is retained, to ensure transparency and accountability. And students should just try their best and not worry.
Blaise Joseph is a research fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies and author of Overcoming the Odds: A Study of Australia’s Top-Performing Disadvantaged Schools.
16 May 2019 | DAILY TELEGRAPH
It’s that time of the school year again. NAPLAN has started, and so have the shouts that the tests are ‘useless’ and ‘harm kids and schools’. But what…
10 May 2019 | Ideas@TheCentre
Schools should have high expectations for student behaviour. And the harsh reality is that this sometimes requires student detentions, suspensions, and expulsions. Queensland government schools last year were…
05 May 2019 | Financial Review
Teachers aren’t going to be replaced by robots. If there are only a few professions where the human aspect is absolutely essential, then teaching is definitely one. Teacher-student…