A “serious problem” in education was identified this week: many Sydney parents are choosing to send their children to government secondary schools outside of their local catchment area (the sheer nerve…how dare they choose what they think is best for their children?).
Some people have seemingly forgotten a basic principle: the government school system exists for parents and their children, not the other way around.
If parents don’t think the local government school is providing what their children need — for whatever reason, those parents have the right to choose a different school. And they should be supported in that choice, not sanctimoniously shamed.
There is also a fundamental moral question here: ultimately, whose responsibility is it to improve a low-performing local government school? Is it really the responsibility of parents of potentially high-achieving students to stay at a low-performing school to lift the average, instead of moving to a better school? Or is it rather the responsibility of the school system (as common sense would dictate) to ensure a decent universal minimum standard, regardless of who chooses to attend the local school?
This comes back to the broader governing principle of subsidiarity. The government should support the initiative of parents and non-government schools who take financial pressure off the government school system.
As my chapter argues in the recently published Reclaiming Education: Renewing Schools and Universities in Contemporary Western Culture, we need to reclaim subsidiarity as a basis for how we fund schools.
For example, the policy of charter schools (government-funded, privately-managed schools) should be seriously considered at the state and territory level in Australia. Charter schools have more flexibility to cater to the needs of disadvantaged students in particular and are a way of expanding school choice for low-income parents.
At the end of the day, children have varying educational needs and parents have varying expectations of schools, so ‘school shopping’ is rightly embedded in Australia’s education system.
16 May 2019 | DAILY TELEGRAPH
It’s that time of the school year again. NAPLAN has started, and so have the shouts that the tests are ‘useless’ and ‘harm kids and schools’. But what…
15 May 2019 | The Australian
Some people don’t want the school system to be accountable to parents. But they forget that government schools exist for parents and their children, not the other way…
10 May 2019 | Ideas@TheCentre
Schools should have high expectations for student behaviour. And the harsh reality is that this sometimes requires student detentions, suspensions, and expulsions. Queensland government schools last year were…