Sugar tax: ‘Do Something’ Economics 101
13 April 2018 | Ideas@TheCentre
The UK’s recent implementation of a sugar tax has reignited the push for an Australian sugar tax, pointing to ‘science’. Often, our scientific and political elites really have no idea what they are doing. But in spite of this, they believe that they should do something.
Rising obesity is a real observable problem but the scientific community hasn’t conclusively identified what the main cause is. Is it too many carbohydrates, too much fatty food, not enough exercise or increased depression? A convenient villain is sugar, hence many in the health lobby have called for punitive taxes on sugar-based soft drinks.
Unfortunately the evidence does not support the case that soft drinks and sugar consumption are major contributors to rising obesity. A contributor, definitely, but not the main culprit.
If sugar is the primary villain shouldn’t its consumption be going up as obesity does? However, while the prevalence of obesity has increased three-fold in Australians since 1980, per capita consumption of refined sugar decreased by 23% from 1980 to 2003.
Further, over the last 15 years there has been a 26% decrease in the per-person sugar contribution from carbonated soft drinks as consumers have replaced regular sugar-based beverages in their shopping trolleys with diet and zero sugar alternatives.
Even if sugar is the right target, why confine the tax to soft drinks? As far as discretionary foods are concerned soft drinks (4%) are ranked seventh on top of the high calorie pops, well behind confectionery/ chocolate (18%), sweet biscuits (13%), alcoholic beverages (13%), burgers/pizzas/tacos (7%), pastries (6%) and fried potatoes/crisps (5%).
Obesity reduces longevity, quality of life, and — in a world of socialised healthcare — hurts taxpayers. A new soft drink tax might salve the conscious of the moral crusaders but it won’t fix this obesity problem. The medical lobby might cry that something must be done. But for a change, let’s have our politicians do nothing until we have a credible, evidence based solution.
Related Commentary
RBA must explain itself
Peter Tulip
26 February 2021 | IDEAS@THECENTRE
The RBA should be required to explain its decisions. This would make mistakes in monetary policy less likely and less persistent. When the Governor of the RBA makes…
GameStop reveals anomalies
Zachary Lanigan
26 February 2021 | IDEAS@THECENTRE
Robinhood, the platform built upon democratising investment, has become an illustrative example of an intrinsic issue for the stock market: it is perceived to be a rigged game…
Endless fiscal stimulus can’t be the new normal
Robert Carling
18 February 2021 | Financial Review
Governments everywhere are being urged to take advantage of near-zero interest rates, throw caution to the wind, shrug off the size of deficits and spend freely. Many of them…