Ending No. 8 Wire Welfare: Why New Zealand is Lagging Behind

Luke Malpass
02 April 2009 | IA109
Ending No. 8 Wire Welfare: Why New Zealand is Lagging Behind
  • In the lead up to the last election, the National Party released its new welfare policy. The work-first policy received unwarranted criticism from many quarters despite New Zealand still lagging behind international best practice in welfare policy. The National Party now leads the government.
  • Policies proposed by the government include a renewed focus on reducing the growth in Invalids Benefits, Sickness Benefits, and the long-term unemployed. Single parents on the Domestic Purposes Benefit will be compelled to take up part-time work when their youngest child turns six. This includes having meaningful reciprocal obligations and imposing penalties on those bucking the rules.
  • The policies are important because work is important. It helps give us a sense of self-respect, helps increase self-reliance, and helps develop healthy habits, relationships and skills. Paradoxically in the developed world, as affluence increases and modern well-being improves, more people rely on the government for all sorts of assistance.
  • New Zealand has a relatively ‘soft’ approach to welfare that is work-first in essence but not necessarily in practice. Overseas experience suggests that work-first approaches to welfare, time-limiting of benefits, workfare systems, and meaningful sanctions for non-compliance help get people back into the workforce. Even the often-cited and supposedly social democratic Nordic and Scandinavian countries have far tougher laws and requirements than New Zealand.
  • The overseas experience suggests that, combined with appropriate training and assistance, these schemes receive cross-party support. This is because high levels of welfare dependency have highly detrimental effects on society. A large welfare state costs money but, more importantly, can create new social problems.
  • The last great recession and adjustment in the 1980s left many people out of work and languishing on welfare rolls for a decade or so. This was the case around the world. Many people no longer felt they had the confidence and skills to participate in a rapidly changing labour market.
  • Introducing more rigorous work-first policies is important in a recession so that if unemployment does rise substantially, people do not lose touch with the world of work. Although by no means coherent and complete, the government’s welfare policy is moving in the right direction.

Luke Malpass is a Policy Analyst with The New Zealand Policy Unit of the Centre for Independent Studies.

Latest Publications

Eight Housing Affordability Myths
Stephen Kirchner
10 July 2014 | IA146

Australians are conflicted in their attitude to this long-run change in real house prices because they are both investors in housing as an asset class and consumers of housing services. This conflicted attitude on the part of the public is reflected in confused public policies followed by Australian governments. Unfortunately, many of the policies pursued by Australian governments in the…

Still Damaging and Disturbing: Australian Child Protection Data and the Need for National Adoption Targets
Jeremy Sammut
16 April 2014 | IA145

In December 2013, the Abbott government announced plans to make it easier for Australian parents to adopt children both locally and from overseas. Acknowledging the official ‘taboo’ on adoption in Australia, Prime Minister Tony Abbott ordered an inter-departmental committee to recommend ways to take adoption out of the ‘too-hard’ basket. The chief barrier to raising the number of local adoptions…

Why Jaydon Can’t Read: A Forum on Fixing Literacy
Jennifer Buckingham, Justine Ferrari, Tom Alegounarias
18 February 2014 | IA144

Many thousands of Australian students have very low levels of literacy after spending four or more years at school. The Spring 2014 issue of the CIS journal Policy contained an article called ‘Why Jaydon Can’t Read: How Ideology Triumphed Over Evidence in Teaching Reading’, which concluded that students were not being provided with the most effective evidence-based reading instruction in…

Independent Charities, Independent Regulators: The Future of Not-for-Profit Regulation
Helen Andrews
06 February 2014 | IA143

The Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission was established by the Gillard government in 2012 with the intended purpose of cutting the red tape faced by Australia’s charities. So far, the regulator has failed to make any significant progress on this goal or on its two other main goals: increasing public trust in charities and improving the quality of regulatory oversight…

The New Silence: Family Breakdown and Child Sexual Abuse
Jeremy Sammut
30 January 2014 | IA142

Despite family breakdown exposing children to greater risk of sexual abuse, the issue receives scant attention in this country. Child sexual abuse is not fully and frankly discussed because the public discourse is self-censored by politicians, academics, social service organisations, and the media in compliance with politically correct attitudes towards ‘family diversity’—the socially ‘progressive’ and ‘non-judgmental’ fiction that says the…