Products – The Centre for Independent Studies

From Riches to Rags What Are Nauru’s Options and How Can Australia Help?

Helen Hughes
18 August 2004 | IA50
From Riches to Rags What Are Nauru’s Options and How Can Australia Help?

Thirty years after enjoying the world’s second highest per capita GDP after Saudi Arabia, Nauru is on the verge of insolvency, has appalling health problems and was declared one of the first ‘rogue’ states under the United States Patriot Act. Nauru’s misfortunes have been primarily brought about by a disregard for basic economics and by inappropriate political institutions and policies, but it has also been the victim of predators that prey on the Pacific.

In the light of its history, what are Nauru’s options? It can continue, with modifications, along its past and current course, or it can fundamentally reform its society and economy. If Nauru does not reform, its population will continue to increase from its present 11,000, crowding its 21sq km island, and its people will become sicker and poorer. Pity and blackmail may squeeze out enough aid to enable Nauruans to eke out an existence. If Nauru reforms, it can become modestly prosperous, recover its health and self-respect, and explore long-term options.

Immediate essential reforms are:

  • Reshaping public finances by ascertaining its assets, paying off all legal debts and dividing remaining funds among Nauruan families to re-establish private property rights. Phosphate and other revenues should in future be paid to private individuals. Public expenditures should henceforth be funded by income tax. This would flush out private fortunes. Commercial operators should be sought to tender for air transport and other services, including banking.
  • Downsizing parliament, commensurately with Nauru’s population, into a pro bono local government council, with a rotating chairman and shrinking the paid public service to a small skilled core, with volunteers taking over many present paid functions and a new emphasis on health and education.
  • Withdrawing from all international organisations except the Pacific Islands Forum and the South Pacific Community.

If Nauru takes these steps, it will not need aid. It will have a base for exploring longer term options of association with another Pacific country, or wait the long time it is likely to take until more Pacific islands are ready for federalism.

Australia has given aid to Nauru to enable it to find solutions to its problems. If Nauru reforms, it will not need further aid. If it does not reform, aid will be wasted.

Pacific islanders, including Nauruans, are welcome to apply to Australia’s non-discriminatory immigration programme. Australia would also, no doubt, be open to negotiations for a form of association with a reformed Nauru if the latter wished to pursue such an option. Association could range from arrangements for Australia representing Nauru diplomatically to integration as an Australian territory if Nauruans were prepared to give up sovereignty over their island in return for full citizenship rights.

Helen Hughes is a Senior Fellow at The Centre for Independent Studies, and Emeritus Professor with The Australian National University (ANU). Professor Hughes, then a Fellow at the ANU, on a pro bono basis negotiated the world price for Nauru’s phosphate in 1963 and helped to mount the constitutional team that enabled Nauru to become an independent republic in 1968 and to nationalise its phosphate mine. She assisted in early financial and business planning (including the building of Nauru House) and in finding Philip Shrapnel & Co, leading Sydney consultants, to take over financial and business planning for Nauru on a commercial basis.

 

Buy Hardcopy
Latest Publications

Eight Housing Affordability Myths
Stephen Kirchner
10 July 2014 | IA146

Australians are conflicted in their attitude to this long-run change in real house prices because they are both investors in housing as an asset class and consumers of housing services. This conflicted attitude on the part of the public is reflected in confused public policies followed by Australian governments. Unfortunately, many of the policies pursued by Australian governments in the…

READ MORE
Still Damaging and Disturbing: Australian Child Protection Data and the Need for National Adoption Targets
Jeremy Sammut
16 April 2014 | IA145

In December 2013, the Abbott government announced plans to make it easier for Australian parents to adopt children both locally and from overseas. Acknowledging the official ‘taboo’ on adoption in Australia, Prime Minister Tony Abbott ordered an inter-departmental committee to recommend ways to take adoption out of the ‘too-hard’ basket. The chief barrier to raising the number of local adoptions…

READ MORE
Why Jaydon Can’t Read: A Forum on Fixing Literacy
Jennifer Buckingham, Justine Ferrari, Tom Alegounarias
18 February 2014 | IA144

Many thousands of Australian students have very low levels of literacy after spending four or more years at school. The Spring 2014 issue of the CIS journal Policy contained an article called ‘Why Jaydon Can’t Read: How Ideology Triumphed Over Evidence in Teaching Reading’, which concluded that students were not being provided with the most effective evidence-based reading instruction in…

READ MORE
Independent Charities, Independent Regulators: The Future of Not-for-Profit Regulation
Helen Andrews
06 February 2014 | IA143

The Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission was established by the Gillard government in 2012 with the intended purpose of cutting the red tape faced by Australia’s charities. So far, the regulator has failed to make any significant progress on this goal or on its two other main goals: increasing public trust in charities and improving the quality of regulatory oversight…

READ MORE
The New Silence: Family Breakdown and Child Sexual Abuse
Jeremy Sammut
30 January 2014 | IA142

Despite family breakdown exposing children to greater risk of sexual abuse, the issue receives scant attention in this country. Child sexual abuse is not fully and frankly discussed because the public discourse is self-censored by politicians, academics, social service organisations, and the media in compliance with politically correct attitudes towards ‘family diversity’—the socially ‘progressive’ and ‘non-judgmental’ fiction that says the…

READ MORE