Welfare reform beyond decades of dependence, ‘dole bludgers’ and ‘double dipping’

Simon Cowan
31 May 2017 | OP156
Welfare reform beyond decades of dependence, ‘dole bludgers’ and ‘double dipping’

Recent attempts to reform welfare have focused on the wrong elements of the system. In some cases, advocating tightening eligibility for unemployment benefits and single mother payments while simultaneously increasing the scope and cost of family benefits and pension payments.

Blaming ‘dole bludgers’ will never result in sustainable welfare reform. The only realistic method of reducing the size of the welfare state is to refocus the existing payment system on need.

This means abandoning forever the distinction between deserving and undeserving welfare recipients. It has proved impossible to constrain the welfare state by limiting growth of payments to the so-called undeserving, as growth in payments to the ‘deserving’ has overwhelmed any savings found.

The safety net should be robust but only available for those who are in genuine need. Government welfare should not be a vehicle for redistributing income in order to create a utopian, ‘equal’ society, or to cushion the vicissitudes of life.

This approach means payments like family tax benefits, the age pension, childcare benefits, paid parental leave, and potentially others should be substantially tightened.

The overall effect of this redesign is that the system should cost less, but provide greater assistance to those who really need it.

Buy Hardcopy
Latest Publications

Rights, Morals, Dignity: Why defending religious freedom matters
Peter Kurti
10 April 2020 | OP173

Calls for protections of rights are often made without much reflection on what it is, exactly, that needs protecting. In this Occasional Paper, Peter Kurti argues that behind any claim about rights lies a moral claim, and that this claim is essentially about human dignity. Rights describe a sphere of personal sovereignty from which others are excluded and which also…

Creativity in an Age of Constraint
Lionel Shriver
02 October 2019 | OP172

2019 John Bonython Lecture – Creativity in the Age of Constraint The proliferating dos and don’ts of political correctness, the predations of ‘gotcha’ identity politics and the hypersensitivities of the #MeToo movement are battering and boxing creativity. There is a danger in faithfully following this host of concocted rules and dutifully avoiding stepping on a plethora of toes. Among other…

The China Challenge
Rowan Callick
28 July 2019 | OP171

The rise of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has helped make Australia rich, but it is also posing challenges to its values, interests, alliances and thus its identity. Xi Xinping’s ambitious New Era represents a decisive break with the Old Era under Deng Xiaoping when China’s foreign policy was to ‘hide’ its strength and ‘bide’ its time. China is…

Taking Back Control: Restoring Universalism in the Age of Identity Politics
Amanda Stoker
16 April 2019 | OP170

It can feel safer avoiding conversations on social issues that can be landmines at the best of times. But the longer those who believe in freedom and responsibility sit on the sidelines, the longer we give free rein for others to shape the debate. Where we can start to shift debate is on the role of government and other institutions…

Why God is Good for You
Greg Sheridan
28 November 2018 | OP169

Conversation with The Australian’s Foreign Editor Greg Sheridan and CIS senior research fellow Peter Kurti on the intellectual, historical and cultural case for belief in God. Australia and many parts of the West are losing faith in God. And yet the Judeo-Christian tradition has created and underpinned the moral and legal fabric of Western Civilisation. Where the moral certainties that underpin Australia’s institutions and laws are…