Myth vs Reality: The case against increasing Capital Gains Tax

Robert Carling
05 March 2019 | PP18
Myth vs Reality: The case against increasing Capital Gains Tax

Australia’s capital gains tax (CGT) policy has been largely settled for almost 20 years. However, it has come under renewed scrutiny as a result of the Australian Labor Party’s federal election platform proposal to halve the 50% CGT discount and thereby effectively increase the tax by 50%.

If the objective of reforming the CGT is to do no more than compensate for inflation, no flat percentage discount will achieve it other than by chance; and a 25% discount will not be sufficient to achieve it in many cases. Even the 50% discount fails to achieve it if the rate of nominal capital gain on an asset is less than twice the rate of inflation.

Inflation compensation would be better achieved by returning to the cost base indexation system that applied up to 1999.

However, there are many justifications for a CGT discount other than compensating for inflation, and those reasons — such as the effect on incentives to invest — are being overlooked in the current debate. A flat percentage discount is a simple design and should be thought of as a rough and approximate way to recognise all the reasons for a concessional CGT.

Rather than halve the discount, it would be better to either:

  • Retain the 50% discount, OR
  • Restore cost base indexation and apply a small discount (say 10 – 20%) to real gains.
Latest Publications

The Economic Challenge of Covid-19
Robert Carling
08 July 2020 | PP32

Even before the Covid-19 pandemic struck, the Australian economy was under-performing its potential and in need of reinvigoration. Economic growth in per capita terms had slowed to a crawl and business investment and productivity growth were depressed. Policy changes that were previously desirable have now been rendered crucial by the pandemic. The shock to the economic system since March has…

READ MORE
Lower Company Tax to Resuscitate the Economy
Jeff Bennett, Michael Potter, Tony Makin
06 July 2020 | PP31

In response to the economic contraction of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal and state governments have dramatically expanded the scope and scale of state involvement in the economy. This massive spike in government spending continues to be funded by increased government borrowing that has put Australia on a path to having about a trillion dollars’ worth of public debt, mostly…

READ MORE
A Fiscal Vaccine for COVID-19
Tony Makin
10 June 2020 | PP30

The fiscal response to the Covid-19 crisis ensures that the federal and state governments will experience large budget deficits and escalating public debt for the foreseeable future. Federal government debt could for instance conceivably double to over $1 trillion within a few years in the absence of substantial budget repair. Many economic questions arise about Australia’s policy response to the…

READ MORE
State Finances after the Pandemic
Robert Carling
28 May 2020 | PP29

The strength of Australia’s government finances is an important dimension of economic performance as it helps set the foundations for the delivery of public services, the flexibility governments need to respond to unexpected events and a stable fiscal environment for private sector investment. This strength is being severely tested by the fiscal consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic. States and territories…

READ MORE
Pain without gain: Why school closures are bad policy
Blaise Joseph, Glenn Fahey
24 May 2020 | PP28

The decision by state and territory governments to strongly advise parents to keep their children at home and essentially close schools went against the health, economic, and educational evidence. There was little health benefit, while there were substantial economic and educational costs. Victoria, Tasmania, the ACT, New South Wales, and Queensland are in a group with the longest government school…

READ MORE