Products – The Centre for Independent Studies

Planning restrictions harm housing affordability

Peter Tulip
03 December 2020 | PP33
Planning restrictions harm housing affordability

Planning restrictions reduce the supply of housing and hence raise its price.  This paper summarises recent research on this topic, focussing on Australia’s largest cities.

The severity of planning regulations can be gauged by the difference between sale prices and the costs of supply.  This wedge represents what people would pay for the legal right to provide extra dwellings at a location. The wedge, and hence prices, are high because these rights are unnecessarily scarce.

For detached houses, costs comprise the dwelling structure and the land that other home-owners need to forego. Planning restrictions are estimated to raise house prices 73 per cent above these costs in Sydney, 69 per cent in Melbourne, 42 per cent in Brisbane and 54 per cent in Perth.

Extra apartments can be supplied by raising the height of new buildings.  This increases construction costs but means that extra land does not need to be used.  Restrictions are estimated to raise the price of the average new apartment by 68 per cent above costs in Sydney, 20 per cent in Melbourne and 2 per cent in Brisbane.

These estimates are in line with a large body of international research which has been thoroughly vetted.

Latest Publications

The Economic Challenge of Covid-19
Robert Carling
08 July 2020 | PP32

Even before the Covid-19 pandemic struck, the Australian economy was under-performing its potential and in need of reinvigoration. Economic growth in per capita terms had slowed to a crawl and business investment and productivity growth were depressed. Policy changes that were previously desirable have now been rendered crucial by the pandemic. The shock to the economic system since March has…

READ MORE
Lower Company Tax to Resuscitate the Economy
Jeff Bennett, Michael Potter, Tony Makin
06 July 2020 | PP31

In response to the economic contraction of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal and state governments have dramatically expanded the scope and scale of state involvement in the economy. This massive spike in government spending continues to be funded by increased government borrowing that has put Australia on a path to having about a trillion dollars’ worth of public debt, mostly…

READ MORE
A Fiscal Vaccine for COVID-19
Tony Makin
10 June 2020 | PP30

The fiscal response to the Covid-19 crisis ensures that the federal and state governments will experience large budget deficits and escalating public debt for the foreseeable future. Federal government debt could for instance conceivably double to over $1 trillion within a few years in the absence of substantial budget repair. Many economic questions arise about Australia’s policy response to the…

READ MORE
State Finances after the Pandemic
Robert Carling
28 May 2020 | PP29

The strength of Australia’s government finances is an important dimension of economic performance as it helps set the foundations for the delivery of public services, the flexibility governments need to respond to unexpected events and a stable fiscal environment for private sector investment. This strength is being severely tested by the fiscal consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic. States and territories…

READ MORE
Pain without gain: Why school closures are bad policy
Blaise Joseph, Glenn Fahey
24 May 2020 | PP28

The decision by state and territory governments to strongly advise parents to keep their children at home and essentially close schools went against the health, economic, and educational evidence. There was little health benefit, while there were substantial economic and educational costs. Victoria, Tasmania, the ACT, New South Wales, and Queensland are in a group with the longest government school…

READ MORE