Fix it or Fail: Why we must cut company tax now

Michael Potter
04 October 2016 | RR20
Fix it or Fail: Why we must cut company tax now

Australia needs to cut company tax to 25% to boost business investment, which is currently at recessionary levels. An investment boost will grow the economy, leading to increased wages, employment, national income, exports and productivity. Business investment is being hampered by our uncompetitive company tax, which is highly inefficient and much more burdensome than in other developed countries.

In the longer term, most of the benefits of the tax cut go to workers, not big business or foreigners. The short-term costs should be seen as government investment, just like investment in infrastructure or improved education, and the budget costs can be fully offset by other policy changes.

The estimated benefits are substantial, and may in fact be underestimated as the modelling assumes that Australian-financed investment won’t increase, when in fact this investment is likely to increase.

Tax avoidance does not argue against the tax cut. Cancelling the tax cut would make tax avoidance worse, would penalise those companies that engage in the least tax avoidance, and leave the largest tax avoiders unaffected.

The benefits are likely to be greatest from cutting the tax rate for all business, not just for small business alone.

Buy Hardcopy
Latest Publications

Medi-Mess: Rational Federalism and Patient Cost-Sharing for Public Hospital Sustainability in Australia
David Gadiel, Jeremy Sammut
16 July 2017 | RR30

The latest attempt to ‘end the blame game’ between the state and federal governments over health funding was scuttled after state premiers rejected Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s ‘tax swap’ federalism reform proposal at the April 2016 COAG meeting.  The intransigence of the states —and the Turnbull government’s subsequent abandonment of its White Paper on Reform of the Federation — was…

READ MORE
The Major Bank Levy: We’re all going to be hit
Michael Potter
19 June 2017 | RR29

The major bank levy was proposed in the 2017–18 Budget. The levy has numerous flaws including: The costs of the levy will likely be passed on as higher interest rates for mortgages and business loans, harming households and business investment which is very weak. The levy won’t materially change the expected surplus, based on current forecasts and therefore will minimally…

READ MORE
Evaluating Indigenous programs: a toolkit for change
Sara Hudson
04 June 2017 | RR28

The federal government recently announced it will allocate $10 million a year over four years to strengthen the evaluation of Indigenous programs. However, given that the average cost of an evaluation is $382,000, the extra $10 million a year for Indigenous program evaluations will not go far. To make the most of this additional funding the government must change the…

READ MORE
Fiscal Fiction: The Real Medicare Levy
Jeremy Sammut
07 May 2017 | RR27

The Medicare Levy is, and always has been, a fiscal fiction. The revenue raised by the levy is not ‘hypothecated’ – dedicated specifically to fund Medicare – but goes into general government revenue. Moreover, the amount of revenue raised by the levy accounts for a mere fraction of government spending on health.  Nevertheless, the levy – by fostering the myth…

READ MORE
The Fantasy of Gonski Funding: The ongoing battle over school spending
Blaise Joseph
30 April 2017 | RR26

The Gonski Report has not been implemented – there is no such thing as ‘Gonski funding.’  The current school funding benchmark is unreasonably high. There were several fundamental issues with the Gonski Report to begin with. There are viable alternative school funding options which should be considered instead.

READ MORE