Submission to Productivity Commission - Draft report: Introducing Competition and Informed User Choice into Human Services

Michael Potter, Sara Hudson
14 July 2017 | CIS Submission
Submission to Productivity Commission - Draft report: Introducing Competition and Informed User Choice into Human Services

The Productivity Commission (PC) released a draft report proposing reforms to increased competition, contestability and informed user choice to human services.

CIS responded to the PC’s report with a submission covering two issues raised in the draft report: social housing and remote Indigenous communities.

In relation to social housing, the CIS submission argues:

  • The PC’s draft report presents strong arguments in favour of social housing tenants being charged market rents. However, this approach will either result in very large increases in out-of-pocket costs for some tenants, or very large increase in government spending.
  • Therefore, the PC should made recommendations for increased choice and competition in the sector without the full-scale adoption of market rents.
  • The model proposed by CIS is for the following:
    • The base social housing rent to remain as a fixed proportion of tenant income, with potential for reforms to this model over time.
    • New social housing tenants, and tenants who wish to move, will be offered the choice of property in the relevant region. All vacant social housing properties would be offered to all prospective tenants.
    • For these tenants involved in the choice process, social housing providers could choose to set a rent discount or supplement.
    • This will mean social housing providers will compete with each other over price, location, quality and services. Competition should drive increased quality, tenant satisfaction, tenant mobility, and sectoral efficiency.
    • Initially, existing tenants would not have a change in rent, but informed choice and differentiated rents should be rolled out to existing social housing tenants with appropriate safeguards.
    • Any government policies that treat public housing and community housing differently should be removed.
    • State governments should, over time, transfer public housing assets to the community sector to increase competition, efficiency, and the scale of the community sector.

In relation to Remote Indigenous communities, the CIS submission:

  • Agrees with the PC draft report’s two principles for service delivery in remote communities — greater community voice and place-based approaches. However, we believe the PC draft report has not clearly articulated the challenges in adopting these principles, notably that increasing community control in the design and delivery of programs does not always led to better programs. Moreover, the unique nature of place-based approaches can make it hard to compare the effectiveness of different program, as any metrics recorded may not be readily compiled, or compared with those from other programs.
  • Agrees with the PC’s draft recommendation 8.5 to: “Invest in better systems to underpin service delivery by developing objectives, conducting community assessments and establishing evaluation and feedback systems” and we believe that developing a co-accountability approach to service delivery and evaluation could help to ensure this happens.
  • Agrees with the PC draft recommendation 8.3 to: “Ensure commissioning processes have a strong focus on transferring skills and capacity to people and organisations in communities.” We support an enabling model of governance in service delivery that promotes a gradual shift in decision-making power, behaviours, responsibilities and attitudes towards one that builds Indigenous leadership.
Latest Publications

Submission to the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet – Consultation Paper: COAG Closing the Gap Refresh
Charles Jacobs
30 April 2018

While the targets set in 2008 were ambitious, and the task immense, the failure to meet the majority of targets implies the need for a reassessment of the underlying principles and structures of the Closing the Gap strategy. The Centre for Independent Studies welcomes the opportunity to make a submission addressing the 2018 Public Discussion Paper. In accordance with recent…

Submission to the Queensland Productivity Commission on: Service Delivery in remote and discrete Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities
Sara Hudson, Heidi Kiekebosch-Fitt
02 June 2017 | CIS Submission

The Inquiry into service delivery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders closely aligns with the CIS’s focus on Indigenous service delivery and achieving better outcomes for Indigenous peoples as part of our Prosperity Project. The Prosperity Project is a program of research focused on the practical measures that will enable Indigenous communities to improve outcomes and bring about meaningful and…

Submission to the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet – Consultation Paper: Indigenous Business Sector Strategy
Sara Hudson, Charles Jacobs
26 May 2017 | CIS Submission

We believe supporting Indigenous businesses contributes to Indigenous empowerment. Unlike program delivery, which tends to be a more passive form of support, supporting Indigenous businesses is an active form of assistance. A multiplier effect occurs when people own a business that goes beyond the financial benefits to the local economy.