Products – The Centre for Independent Studies

Withholding Dividends: Better ways to make the public sector efficient

Alexander Philipatos
29 May 2014 | T30.10
Withholding Dividends: Better ways to make the public sector efficient

As the commission of audit has uncovered, the government must make significant cuts to spending to get the budget back into surplus. In the quest to find savings, the government cannot ignore the public service. For almost 25 years the government has turned to the efficiency dividend to find budget savings and improve efficiency in the public service. But the efficiency dividend has failed to keep costs under control.

Throughout the 2000s, agency running costs grew 23% in real terms (adjusted for inflation) despite an efficiency dividend of at least 1% throughout the decade. The dividend has also failed to curb costly changes in the size and makeup of the public service.

Since the early 1990s the Australian Public Service (APS) has grown top heavy. There are more managers at the top drawing increasingly generous salaries. But tackling these problems is not as simple as cutting the number of public servants.

New programs and policies are driving greater spending and more public servants. The public sector requires a more targeted approach to driving efficiency.

The government should make public services more contestable, either by offering competitive tender to the private sector, or by benchmarking the public service against the private sector. It should also look to continually review new policies and programs to improve the performance of worthwhile initiatives, and to cull unnecessary functions.

Alexander Philipatos is a Policy Analyst in the Economics Program. His research has included analysis of public transport infrastructure, but focuses predominantly on industrial relations and labour market policy. Alexander has a Bachelor of Economics (Hons) from La Trobe University; before joining the CIS in 2011, he was a tutor at La Trobe teaching Introduction to Quantitative Analysis.

 

Latest Publications

Fairer Paid Parental Leave
Matthew Taylor
07 July 2014 | T30.11

Australia spends just under $1.4 billion (2012–13) on statutory Paid Parental Leave (PPL) to provide more than 130,000 parents with up to 18 weeks of parental leave paid at the full-time minimum wage. The Abbott government proposes to pay primary carers at their pre-birth wages up to a cap of $100,000 for up to 26 weeks. This policy would dramatically…

READ MORE
School Funding on a Budget
Jennifer Buckingham
30 April 2014 | T30.09

Government expenditure on schools has more than doubled in real terms in the last 25 years, while student numbers have only grown by 18%. Funding for school education was 3.1% of GDP in 2012–13, and is projected to reach 3.4% by 2025 under current predictions of economic growth. Large increases in real per-student expenditure have not been accompanied by improved…

READ MORE
Submission to the National Commission of Audit
Alexander Philipatos, Jennifer Buckingham, Jeremy Sammut, Robert Carling, Simon Cowan, Stephen Kirchner, Trisha Jha
01 April 2014 | T30.08

The federal government’s Commission of Audit (CoA) was established in 2013 to review the performance and role of government. This publication is an edited version of the CIS submission to the CoA listing practical solutions aimed at cutting government expenditure. The government should adopt a dual approach to its review of spending. First, spending cuts can save the federal government…

READ MORE
States of Debt
Robert Carling
20 March 2014 | T30.07

While Commonwealth government debt has been the focus of attention recently, this report takes a broader view by bringing state debt into the picture. State debt, like that of the federal government, has also risen dramatically since 2007, when net debt was negative. In the six years to 2013, states added $70 billion to their general government net debt, to…

READ MORE
Strengthening Australia’s Fiscal Institutions
Stephen Kirchner
12 December 2013 | T30.06

The deterioration in the federal government’s fiscal position reflects a failure to adhere to a rules-based framework for fiscal policy to guide spending and tax decisions. Fiscal policy has been distracted by the pursuit of macroeconomic stabilisation objectives that are inconsistent with the institutional design of Australia’s overall macroeconomic policy framework. An independent central bank pursuing an inflation target, combined…

READ MORE