Smart phones have become a big educational talking point. This year, the French government banned the use of mobile phones in schools, while the New York City department of education has recently relaxed its strict ban on mobile phones in schools. The NSW government announced a review on the use of mobile phones in schools late last week.
A review might be useful, but schools don’t have to wait for a government directive to set policies about mobile phones. Numerous schools already have strong restrictions on students’ mobile phone use during school hours — some do not allow students to use phones at all, while others just prohibit their use in the classroom.
There are two key questions schools need to consider when deciding on their mobile phone policy — one is the socio-emotional impact, and the other is the effect on student learning.
There are multiple studies on the link between prevalence of mobile phone use and poorer mental health outcomes for children and adolescents; with some studies showing a weak negative relationship overall, and others finding a stronger one.
Research on the effect of smart phones on educational performance also points in the negative direction. A meta-analysis published earlier this year found a small negative relationship overall between mobile phone use and academic achievement; however this included phone use both in and out of school hours. Other researchers have found that phone use in class exacerbates educational inequalities. For example, a study comparing academic outcomes over time in English high schools with differing policies on mobile phone use found a significant improvement in performance by low-achieving students in schools that introduced bans, with little effect on high-achieving students.
Several factors are likely to contribute to the negative educational impact of phones and other personal electronic devices in classrooms. One of the most powerful is distraction, both for the student and for their classmates. But even if phones, tablets or laptops are being used for educational purposes such as note-taking, there is substantial evidence this is not optimal for learning, with numerous studies showing that writing notes by hand leads to better comprehension and retention of information than typing. There is also emerging evidence that reading on screens is different in quality to reading on paper.
Students have plenty of opportunities to use their phones when they are not in class. At the moment the risks outweigh the benefits and schools would be wise to limit their use.
19 September 2018 | Australian Financial Review
NAPLAN and My School were introduced for good reasons and continue to serve an important purpose. Yet they are constantly under threat from powerful players in education policy…
07 September 2018 | Ideas@TheCentre
About one in four Australian university students drop out and don’t complete their degree. One of the questions this raises is: are schools adequately preparing students for higher…
03 September 2018 | The Australian Financial Review
It’s a myth that primary school is less important than secondary school. Parental engagement and support is vital throughout a child’s education, but never more so than in…
Full Name (including Title) *
Email Address *