Reinventing New Zealand’s Welfare State

Peter Saunders
27 March 2007 | IA85
Reinventing New Zealand’s Welfare State

Government in New Zealand keeps expanding. The main driver has been the inexorable increase in spending on the welfare state.

New Zealanders are much richer than when the welfare state was founded. People’s incomes should therefore be sufficient for them to buy many of the services earlier generations could not afford. This means reliance on government assistance should be declining, but it is escalating.

The main explanation why welfare state expenditure is still growing is tax-welfare ‘churning’. Many people pay high taxes only to get much or all of their money back in the form of government payments and services. At least half of all welfare state expenditure in New Zealand is churned in this way.

There are good economic reasons for reducing tax-welfare churning—it is inefficient, it creates work disincentives and it will generate unsustainable levels of government spending in the future. But the strongest reasons are sociological—it disempowers people, undermines social cohesion and politicises civil society.

Reducing tax-welfare churning while still ensuring that everyone is guaranteed a decent, basic level of provision requires three major policy changes:

  • Reform of income tax so nobody pays tax until they have earned enough to cover their own basic subsistence needs. This can be done by introducing a tax-free earnings threshold equivalent to the welfare minimum income—about $11,500 for a single person and $19,000 for couples opting for joint taxation.
  • All workers should make tax-deductible annual contributions into special personal savings accounts so they do not have to rely on government assistance when their employment is temporarily interrupted by unemployment or sickness. To start them off, the government should denationalise its Superannuation Fund and redistribute the money into these personal accounts, giving every New Zealander an initial $3,000 deposit.
  • All those whose tax is currently being churned back to them in welfare state benefits and services should be given the right to opt out of the government health and/or superannuation systems in return for tax reductions, which would be paid directly into their personal savings accounts. They would then be required to build up savings for their retirement and to buy a catastrophic health insurance policy to complement their routine medical purchases.

Professor Peter Saunders is the Director of Social Research at The Centre for Independent Studies and author of Australia’s Welfare Habit, and How to Kick It.

Latest Publications

Eight Housing Affordability Myths
Stephen Kirchner
10 July 2014 | IA146

Australians are conflicted in their attitude to this long-run change in real house prices because they are both investors in housing as an asset class and consumers of housing services. This conflicted attitude on the part of the public is reflected in confused public policies followed by Australian governments. Unfortunately, many of the policies pursued by Australian governments in the…

Still Damaging and Disturbing: Australian Child Protection Data and the Need for National Adoption Targets
Jeremy Sammut
16 April 2014 | IA145

In December 2013, the Abbott government announced plans to make it easier for Australian parents to adopt children both locally and from overseas. Acknowledging the official ‘taboo’ on adoption in Australia, Prime Minister Tony Abbott ordered an inter-departmental committee to recommend ways to take adoption out of the ‘too-hard’ basket. The chief barrier to raising the number of local adoptions…

Why Jaydon Can’t Read: A Forum on Fixing Literacy
Jennifer Buckingham, Justine Ferrari, Tom Alegounarias
18 February 2014 | IA144

Many thousands of Australian students have very low levels of literacy after spending four or more years at school. The Spring 2014 issue of the CIS journal Policy contained an article called ‘Why Jaydon Can’t Read: How Ideology Triumphed Over Evidence in Teaching Reading’, which concluded that students were not being provided with the most effective evidence-based reading instruction in…

Independent Charities, Independent Regulators: The Future of Not-for-Profit Regulation
Helen Andrews
06 February 2014 | IA143

The Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission was established by the Gillard government in 2012 with the intended purpose of cutting the red tape faced by Australia’s charities. So far, the regulator has failed to make any significant progress on this goal or on its two other main goals: increasing public trust in charities and improving the quality of regulatory oversight…

The New Silence: Family Breakdown and Child Sexual Abuse
Jeremy Sammut
30 January 2014 | IA142

Despite family breakdown exposing children to greater risk of sexual abuse, the issue receives scant attention in this country. Child sexual abuse is not fully and frankly discussed because the public discourse is self-censored by politicians, academics, social service organisations, and the media in compliance with politically correct attitudes towards ‘family diversity’—the socially ‘progressive’ and ‘non-judgmental’ fiction that says the…