School Funding for All: Making Sense of the Debate over Dollars

Jennifer Buckingham
12 October 2000 | IA17
School Funding for All: Making Sense of the Debate over Dollars

Public debate over school funding is characterised by misinformation and misunderstanding. Any sort of agreement or compromise seems unlikely when so many of the arguments are based on erroneous premises.

The facts are:

  • State and territory governments allocate the vast majority of their school education funding to public schools while the federal government’s school education funding is weighted toward the non-government sector. In the 2000-2001 budgets, government schools are allocated 36% of Commonwealth funding and around 92% of state and territory funding.
  • Total government expenditure for children in non-government schools is significantly less than that for children in public schools. Average per capita funding in 1998 was $6037 for government school students and $3451 for non-government school students.
  • Under the Educational Resources Index system, funding for non-government schools has been allocated according to the level of income the school derives from private sources, including fees and donations of goods and services. Proposed new federal funding arrangements would measure the socioeconomic status (SES) of the school population, thereby determining the needs of parents rather than the school.
  • Some of the schools classified as ‘Category 1’ schools – the wealthiest schools – under the ERI system will be eligible for increased funding under the SES system.
  • The Enrolment Benchmark Adjustment (EBA) was designed to recover funds from the state government when enrolments in the non-government sector grow, because each child that enrols in a non-government school costs the state government less and the federal government more.
  • The funds recovered from the states under the EBA are not transferred directly to the non-government sector, as is commonly believed. Non-government schools receive funding on a per capita basis that is unrelated to the EBA.
  • School funding in Australia is a complex combination of federal and state, tied and untied, recurrent and capital, and targeted programme grants. It is almost impossible to determine exactly how much of the total education budget is from each source and for each purpose.

As long as this arrangement exists, there will be acrimony between the school sectors, and competition for resources based on these divisions. A common non-discriminatory system of school funding is urgently required, where all schools are funded on the same basis regardless of sector. Such a system should be student-centred and would therefore reflect the needs and choices of students and their parents.

Jennifer Buckingham is a Policy Analyst with the Taking Children Seriously research program at The Centre for Independent Studies.

Latest Publications

Eight Housing Affordability Myths
Stephen Kirchner
10 July 2014 | IA146

Australians are conflicted in their attitude to this long-run change in real house prices because they are both investors in housing as an asset class and consumers of housing services. This conflicted attitude on the part of the public is reflected in confused public policies followed by Australian governments. Unfortunately, many of the policies pursued by Australian governments in the…

Still Damaging and Disturbing: Australian Child Protection Data and the Need for National Adoption Targets
Jeremy Sammut
16 April 2014 | IA145

In December 2013, the Abbott government announced plans to make it easier for Australian parents to adopt children both locally and from overseas. Acknowledging the official ‘taboo’ on adoption in Australia, Prime Minister Tony Abbott ordered an inter-departmental committee to recommend ways to take adoption out of the ‘too-hard’ basket. The chief barrier to raising the number of local adoptions…

Why Jaydon Can’t Read: A Forum on Fixing Literacy
Jennifer Buckingham, Justine Ferrari, Tom Alegounarias
18 February 2014 | IA144

Many thousands of Australian students have very low levels of literacy after spending four or more years at school. The Spring 2014 issue of the CIS journal Policy contained an article called ‘Why Jaydon Can’t Read: How Ideology Triumphed Over Evidence in Teaching Reading’, which concluded that students were not being provided with the most effective evidence-based reading instruction in…

Independent Charities, Independent Regulators: The Future of Not-for-Profit Regulation
Helen Andrews
06 February 2014 | IA143

The Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission was established by the Gillard government in 2012 with the intended purpose of cutting the red tape faced by Australia’s charities. So far, the regulator has failed to make any significant progress on this goal or on its two other main goals: increasing public trust in charities and improving the quality of regulatory oversight…

The New Silence: Family Breakdown and Child Sexual Abuse
Jeremy Sammut
30 January 2014 | IA142

Despite family breakdown exposing children to greater risk of sexual abuse, the issue receives scant attention in this country. Child sexual abuse is not fully and frankly discussed because the public discourse is self-censored by politicians, academics, social service organisations, and the media in compliance with politically correct attitudes towards ‘family diversity’—the socially ‘progressive’ and ‘non-judgmental’ fiction that says the…