Valuing Education: A Response to the Australia Institute Report 'Buying an Education'

Jennifer Buckingham
21 January 2004 | IA43
Valuing Education: A Response to the Australia Institute Report 'Buying an Education'

The Australia Institute recently published a report called Buying An Education: Where Are The Returns Highest?. The author of the report, Richard Denniss, argues that parents would be wiser to save the money they might spend on non-government schooling, and use it to pay for a full-fee university place.

This argument rests on two claims. First, that schools do not directly affect achievement, so non-government schools are not worth the expense. Second, that anyone with enough money will be able to enrol in the course of their choice at their preferred university.

This paper shows that the evidence used by Denniss to support these claims is flawed:

  • The report suggests that the cost of a non-government school education is higher than the cost of a public school education, and is increasing at a greater rate. They are, in fact, very similar when all categories of expenditure are taken into account.
  • The report erroneously assumes that parents choose non-government schools mainly for academic reasons, and as a means of accessing university.
  • The evidence presented to establish that socioeconomic status is more important than the school attended, and that non-government schools do not offer any educational advantage, misinterprets and misrepresents the research cited.
  • Universities cannot offer an indefinite number of full-fee places to anyone who wants one, and the places they do offer are in addition to government-funded HECS places.

It is impossible for parents to predict whether their child will have to pay for their university education, or whether full-fee places will even exist then. Parents have to make decisions about what is best for their children in the short, medium and long term. This is to ensure their children receive a quality education.

There is good evidence that non-government schools, on average, offer an educational advantage. Such broad stroke comparisons may not apply to individual schools, however. The fact that parents can only compare school sectors, rather than individual schools on their merits, is one of the far more important problems in education that the Australia Institute report fails to address.

Jennifer Buckingham is a Policy Analyst at The Centre for Independent Studies. She is the author of numerous publications on school education, including Schools in the Spotlight: School Performance Reporting and Public Accountability (2003) and Families, Freedom and Education: Why School Choice Makes Sense (2001).

Latest Publications

Eight Housing Affordability Myths
Stephen Kirchner
10 July 2014 | IA146

Australians are conflicted in their attitude to this long-run change in real house prices because they are both investors in housing as an asset class and consumers of housing services. This conflicted attitude on the part of the public is reflected in confused public policies followed by Australian governments. Unfortunately, many of the policies pursued by Australian governments in the…

Still Damaging and Disturbing: Australian Child Protection Data and the Need for National Adoption Targets
Jeremy Sammut
16 April 2014 | IA145

In December 2013, the Abbott government announced plans to make it easier for Australian parents to adopt children both locally and from overseas. Acknowledging the official ‘taboo’ on adoption in Australia, Prime Minister Tony Abbott ordered an inter-departmental committee to recommend ways to take adoption out of the ‘too-hard’ basket. The chief barrier to raising the number of local adoptions…

Why Jaydon Can’t Read: A Forum on Fixing Literacy
Jennifer Buckingham, Justine Ferrari, Tom Alegounarias
18 February 2014 | IA144

Many thousands of Australian students have very low levels of literacy after spending four or more years at school. The Spring 2014 issue of the CIS journal Policy contained an article called ‘Why Jaydon Can’t Read: How Ideology Triumphed Over Evidence in Teaching Reading’, which concluded that students were not being provided with the most effective evidence-based reading instruction in…

Independent Charities, Independent Regulators: The Future of Not-for-Profit Regulation
Helen Andrews
06 February 2014 | IA143

The Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission was established by the Gillard government in 2012 with the intended purpose of cutting the red tape faced by Australia’s charities. So far, the regulator has failed to make any significant progress on this goal or on its two other main goals: increasing public trust in charities and improving the quality of regulatory oversight…

The New Silence: Family Breakdown and Child Sexual Abuse
Jeremy Sammut
30 January 2014 | IA142

Despite family breakdown exposing children to greater risk of sexual abuse, the issue receives scant attention in this country. Child sexual abuse is not fully and frankly discussed because the public discourse is self-censored by politicians, academics, social service organisations, and the media in compliance with politically correct attitudes towards ‘family diversity’—the socially ‘progressive’ and ‘non-judgmental’ fiction that says the…