Regulating for Quality in Childcare: The Evidence Base

Trisha Jha
05 November 2014 | PM142
Regulating for Quality in Childcare: The Evidence Base

The National Quality Agenda (NQA) endorsed by all states and territories in 2009 regulates childcare systems across Australia. It mandates increased minimum standards in various aspects provision of care and a ratings system with the goal of improving quality.

The NQA mandates substantial and costly reforms to staff-to-child ratios and carer qualifications of care.

This report details that the costs of these reforms have been understated and the potential benefits overstated.

There are four kinds of costs that the commissioned reports do not adequately take into account: administrative costs, impacts on supply, impacts on female labour force participation and deadweight loss.

Furthermore, there is very little evidence from Australian and international research that these stricter regulations improve outcomes for children. Australian studies suggest there are only small positive effects of lower staff-to-child ratios for socio-emotional and behavioural outcomes—not for cognitive outcomes—and it is not clear whether the effects are enduring. Overseas studies found no effects, or effects only for younger children.

Australian studies mostly found no effect of higher carer qualifications on child outcomes, with the exception of one study which found improved behavioural outcomes for older children. Overseas studies mostly found no effects on child outcomes, with one exception which found improvement in children’s academic achievement.

In summary, there is scant evidence to suggest the reforms will bring significant benefits to children, bringing into question whether the cost involved represents an ‘investment’.

Trisha Jha is a Policy Analyst with the Social Foundations Program at The Centre for Independent Studies. She holds a Bachelor of Arts (International Relations) from the Australian National University. Trisha is the author of Complex Family Payments: What it Costs the Village to Raise a Child and has contributed to other CIS publications.

 

Buy Hardcopy
Latest Publications

The Kinship Conundrum: The Impact of Aboriginal Self-Determination on Indigenous Child Protection
Jeremy Sammut
08 December 2014 | PM144

This report argues that mainstreaming revolution in Indigenous policy should be extended to Indigenous child protection policy, and that Aboriginal exceptionalism—typified by the operation of Aboriginal Child Placement Principle (ACPP)—must cease. To help ‘Close the Gap’ in social outcomes between Indigenous and other Australians, Indigenous and non-Indigenous children should be treated the same, including by using adoption (or permanent guardianship)…

READ MORE
An Ounce of Prevention? A Toolkit for Evaluating Preventive Health Measures
Helen Andrews
26 November 2014 | PM143

Preventive health is a broad umbrella that includes such disparate services as vaccines for schoolchildren, blood pressure screenings, ad campaigns to discourage binge drinking, and special taxes on tobacco products. What all these programs have in common is an intention to spend money now in order to save money later—catching costly health problems before they arise or when they are…

READ MORE
Complex Family Payments: What it Costs the Village to Raise a Child
Trisha Jha
06 August 2014 | PM141

In 2013–14, $32 billion was spent on family payments, amounting to 7.7% of total federal expenditure in that year, and 22% of total federal spending on social security and welfare. Family Tax Benefits (FTB) and child care fee assistance are the two areas in which spending is the most significant and, in the case of child care assistance, the most…

READ MORE
Lessons from Singapore: Opt-Out Health Savings Accounts for Australia
David Gadiel, Jeremy Sammut
28 July 2014 | PM140

Singapore’s distinctive health funding and service provision arrangements have delivered comparable First World standards of care and health outcomes at much lower cost. A new vision for funding health in Australia based on the Singapore model could be achieved by applying the principle of choice for those who wish for an alternative to Australia’s taxpayer-funded, universal health care system. This…

READ MORE
The Forgotten Freedom: Threats to Religious Liberty in Australia
Peter Kurti
01 July 2014 | PM139

The campaign for what has been dubbed ‘marriage equality’ is gaining ground in many Western countries, including Australia, despite religious and secular people not always sharing a common point of view on the matter. In an accompanying development, the cause of marriage equality has become something of proxy for those who advance an aggressive secularism and dismiss the religious reservations…

READ MORE