The Rise of Religious Schools in Australia

Jennifer Buckingham
16 September 2010 | PM111
The Rise of Religious Schools in Australia

More than 1.1 million students (out of a total student population of 3.4 million) attend non-government schools in Australia. More than 90% of these students are in religious schools.

Although the Howard Coalition government (1996–2007) is commonly attributed with responsibility for the unprecedented growth in non-government schools, there were two periods in the last century when the growth rate was higher—the 1950s and the first half of the 1980s.

The defining change in schooling over the last two decades has been the diversification of religious schools. Before the 1980s, close to 90% of students in the non-government sector attended schools associated with the two major denominations, Catholic and Anglican. In 2006, this proportion dropped to just over 70%, with the remaining students attending schools affiliated with a large array of minority faiths. The most substantive increases in enrolments have been in Islamic schools and new classifications of ‘fundamentalist’ Christian denominations.

Previously unpublished Census data show that the distribution of children from religious families across school sectors also changed markedly between 1996 and 2006. Some religious groups—particularly Jewish and Catholic—have had traditionally high rates of enrolment in non-government schools, and this has changed little. However, other religious groups increased their enrolments in the non-government sector significantly, almost entirely in independent schools. In 1996, 9% of Muslim students attended independent schools, increasing to 21% in 2006. In 1996, 28% of fundamentalist Christian students attended independent schools, increasing to 40% in 2006.

Although religious schools dominate the non-government school sector, numerous parent surveys indicate that religion is usually not the most important factor in choice of school. It is outweighed by discipline, educational quality, and the school’s capacity to develop their child’s potential.

Schooling in Australia has had a long association with churches, but concerns have been voiced about the social impact of the segregation of students into religious and sometimes culturally homogeneous schools. It has been claimed that religious schools undermine social cohesion by reducing the opportunity for children from different backgrounds to interact and develop tolerance and appreciation of diversity, and that the teaching of religion is authoritarian and harmful to children.

The available Australian and international evidence does not support this contention. Data from the Australian Survey of Social Attitudes (AuSSA) finds that people who attended non-government schools (which are usually religious schools) do not express opinions that are less socially liberal or less tolerant of difference than people who attended government schools. On some issues, the opposite is the case. People who attended non-government schools actually have higher rates of civic participation than people who attended government schools. Furthermore, there is no evidence that attending a religious school increases religious commitment among students.

Not all religious schools generate the same amount of community disquiet. Two types of school in particular receive the most media attention—Islamic schools and the Exclusive Brethren schools. Arguably, much unease about these schools stems from the lack of information and, in some cases, misinformation. There is no reason to believe that these schools are the source of problems either for students or for society.

Likewise, there is no evidence that the increase in the number of enrolments and religious schools has exacerbated social tensions or created a sectarian divide. On the contrary, it can be argued that religious schools circumvent conflict by allowing free expression of different values and beliefs.

Multicultural societies have to attempt a difficult and delicate balancing act between social cohesion and pluralism. Differences must be respected but a stable, free society requires that some core values are preserved. Aggressive secularism and heavy regulation of religious schools potentially undermine that process.

Jennifer Buckingham is a Research Fellow with the Social Foundations program at The Centre for Independent Studies. Jennifer has been at the forefront of debate on education matters, with more than a hundred articles in major newspapers and regular radio appearances. She is the author of the CIS Policy Monographs Boy Troubles (2000), Families, Freedom and Education (2001), Schools in the Spotlight (2003), and Schools of Thought: A Collection of Articles on Education (2009).

 

Buy Hardcopy
Latest Publications

The Kinship Conundrum: The Impact of Aboriginal Self-Determination on Indigenous Child Protection
Jeremy Sammut
08 December 2014 | PM144

This report argues that mainstreaming revolution in Indigenous policy should be extended to Indigenous child protection policy, and that Aboriginal exceptionalism—typified by the operation of Aboriginal Child Placement Principle (ACPP)—must cease. To help ‘Close the Gap’ in social outcomes between Indigenous and other Australians, Indigenous and non-Indigenous children should be treated the same, including by using adoption (or permanent guardianship)…

READ MORE
An Ounce of Prevention? A Toolkit for Evaluating Preventive Health Measures
Helen Andrews
26 November 2014 | PM143

Preventive health is a broad umbrella that includes such disparate services as vaccines for schoolchildren, blood pressure screenings, ad campaigns to discourage binge drinking, and special taxes on tobacco products. What all these programs have in common is an intention to spend money now in order to save money later—catching costly health problems before they arise or when they are…

READ MORE
Regulating for Quality in Childcare: The Evidence Base
Trisha Jha
05 November 2014 | PM142

The National Quality Agenda (NQA) endorsed by all states and territories in 2009 regulates childcare systems across Australia. It mandates increased minimum standards in various aspects provision of care and a ratings system with the goal of improving quality. The NQA mandates substantial and costly reforms to staff-to-child ratios and carer qualifications of care. This report details that the costs…

READ MORE
Complex Family Payments: What it Costs the Village to Raise a Child
Trisha Jha
06 August 2014 | PM141

In 2013–14, $32 billion was spent on family payments, amounting to 7.7% of total federal expenditure in that year, and 22% of total federal spending on social security and welfare. Family Tax Benefits (FTB) and child care fee assistance are the two areas in which spending is the most significant and, in the case of child care assistance, the most…

READ MORE
Lessons from Singapore: Opt-Out Health Savings Accounts for Australia
David Gadiel, Jeremy Sammut
28 July 2014 | PM140

Singapore’s distinctive health funding and service provision arrangements have delivered comparable First World standards of care and health outcomes at much lower cost. A new vision for funding health in Australia based on the Singapore model could be achieved by applying the principle of choice for those who wish for an alternative to Australia’s taxpayer-funded, universal health care system. This…

READ MORE