Products – The Centre for Independent Studies

Exposing the Stealth Tax: the Bracket Creep rip-off

Robert Carling, Michael Potter
13 December 2015 | Research Report 8
Exposing the Stealth Tax: the Bracket Creep rip-off

View Interactive Snapshot

Bracket creep occurs when taxpayers pay a higher tax rate as their incomes increase due to inflation and economic growth. The tax increase due to bracket creep is $6 billion this year and the annual cost will hit $17 billion in 2018-19.

The impact of bracket creep is largely regressive, hitting low income earners harder. Taxpayers in the decile from $37,500 to $46,500 are worst hit, facing a $1,300 reduction in take home pay (a 3.3% cut) in 2018-19. Bracket creep is causing 2.5 million taxpayers to face higher marginal tax rates, but the impost causes average tax rate to go up for all taxpayers.

Most of this impact is caused by inflation, with real wages growth causing a smaller but still important increase in tax rates.

Bracket creep discourages employment, innovation and skills acquisition, and encourages tax avoidance. Bracket creep also harms budget transparency, and it the flexibility it provides to governments often result in stealth tax increases. The government is also inconsistent in refusing to index tax thresholds, while still indexing excise on alcohol, tobacco and fuel.

To address this issue, the government should index tax thresholds to wages growth, or set thresholds at a fixed proportion of average wages, with no discretion. Discretion is fraught with risks, and is likely to result in tax increases based on Australian and overseas evidence.

Buy Hardcopy
Latest Publications

Beating lockdown blues: Students pass the Covid test
Glenn Fahey
25 October 2021 | RR42

Students have suffered educational disruption in combatting the spread of covid-19. Education policy and practice during the pandemic has faced uncertainty, with some a priori assumptions proven true, while others not. The research tests the following a priori assumptions of home-based learning against the evidence that is now available: Disadvantaged students will suffer educationally from a digital divide. Students will…

Mind the Gap: Understanding the Indigenous education gap and how to close it
Glenn Fahey
24 June 2021 | RR41

Indigenous educational disadvantage remains among the most pressing and persistent public policy challenges in Australia. Despite bipartisan and intergovernmental commitment to ‘Closing the Gap’, has done little to move the needle in education outcomes. Dispiritingly poor education outcomes persist despite the best of intentions, considerable investment of resources, and countless programmes and initiatives of policymakers. This research examines sources and…

Dollars and Sense: Time for smart reform of Australian school funding
Glenn Fahey
01 December 2020 | RR40

Australia is among the world’s highest-spending countries on schooling. Yet, the educational return on this investment for parents, taxpayers, employers, and students, has deteriorated — despite the expectation of policymakers that increased funding would inevitably improve educational outcomes. It’s true that money matters when it comes to schooling, but how money is used is what really matters, not how much…

Overcoming the Odds: A study of Australia’s top-performing disadvantaged schools
Blaise Joseph
18 March 2019 | RR39

Students from disadvantaged social backgrounds perform worse on average academically than more advantaged students. This study investigated Australia’s top-performing disadvantaged schools in terms of literacy and numeracy results, with the aim of finding any common policies and practices which have led to their success. Nine top-performing disadvantaged schools were visited by a researcher for this study, involving interviews with school…

Dying with Their Rights On: The myths and realities of ending homelessness in Australia
Carlos d'Abrera
12 December 2018 | RR38

The orthodox understanding of the causes of homelessness promoted by the ‘homelessness industry’ over emphasises the role of economic and social structures. Solutions based on structuralist explanations – such as increasing the supply of affordable social housing – are insufficient to reduce rough sleeping. Such approaches minimise the need to address assertively, the individual characteristics, choices, and behaviours of rough…